Nabil Luqman

0f9d2dd4f71434084e2b6094de1865e23abb37bb9f28ca51feeabee679ec9be2

Social

India

China

Apple

iPhone

Donald Trump

tariff

trade war

manufacturing

Apple has quietly undertaken a major logistical operation, airlifting up to 1.5 million iPhones from India to the United States in an urgent effort to dodge a dramatic hike in import tariffs. The move comes amid escalating tensions between the US and China, triggered by former President Donald Trump&rsquo;s sweeping tariff measures under his self-proclaimed &ldquo;Liberation Day&rdquo; trade initiative.
Under Trump&rsquo;s latest trade policy shift, Chinese imports into the US &mdash; including Apple&rsquo;s flagship product &mdash; now face tariffs of up to 125%, with threats of a further increase to 145%. This is a critical blow to companies like Apple, which still manufacture the vast majority of their iPhones in China. In retaliation, China has imposed an 84% tariff on American goods, fuelling a worsening trade war that has spooked global markets and left tech firms scrambling to adapt.
Six Cargo Flights, 600 Tonnes, 1.5 Million Devices
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/0091724b47ef9b9e1de2270e40a513bcfe19eee16203df88c59f2b41bbeed118" />
To avoid being caught by the tariff deadline, Apple chartered at least six cargo planes, each reportedly carrying up to 100 tonnes of iPhones, from its Indian manufacturing hubs to the US. The total weight of the cargo &mdash; around 600 tonnes &mdash; translates to an estimated 1.5 million iPhones once packaging is taken into account.
The scale of the operation is enormous, not only in terms of volume but also in the urgency with which it was carried out. A source familiar with Apple&rsquo;s plans told Reuters that the company successfully lobbied Indian airport authorities to slash the customs clearance time at Chennai Airport from 30 hours to just six &mdash; a vital move to get the devices airborne as quickly as possible.
India Becomes Apple&rsquo;s Strategic Manufacturing Backup
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/f8e54b51dfab91b56575983c4ff9815a4f80435cabc51ac7d3266ecd48928b66" />
Apple&rsquo;s heavy reliance on Chinese manufacturing &mdash; with roughly 80% of its iPhones assembled there &mdash; has long been a potential vulnerability. However, in recent years, the company has been steadily diversifying its supply chain, and the current trade crisis has accelerated that strategy.
India, where about one in ten iPhones are currently made, has become a critical alternative. Trump had originally set a 26% tariff rate for Indian imports, but following market backlash and international pressure, he announced a 90-day moratorium on those increases &mdash; though China was notably excluded. During this window, Indian goods entering the US are subject to a reduced tariff of just 10%, making India a far more cost-effective export base than China.
Apple, seeking to capitalise on this temporary opening, has begun ramping up production at its Chennai-based Foxconn facility, even extending operations to Sundays &mdash; typically a non-working day &mdash; to meet demand. Two sources confirmed that Apple&rsquo;s factories in India are currently operating under intensified schedules to fulfil shipment targets.
Surge in Production and Long-Term Shifts 
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/d0ef30ac73834fefbe9f1da8fbeca81253c6a4df8caed0e1d2dc69a20f90da53" />
Apple has reportedly set a goal to increase Indian iPhone production by 20% this year. This includes hiring more workers, expanding production shifts, and working closely with suppliers to streamline output. The Foxconn plant in Chennai alone produced around 20 million iPhones last year, including the latest iPhone 15 and 16 models.
The company currently operates three manufacturing sites in India through its partners Foxconn and Tata, with two more under development. These efforts are not just about avoiding immediate tariffs, but part of a broader, long-term strategy to diversify manufacturing away from China &mdash; a shift accelerated by geopolitical instability, pandemic disruptions, and rising labour costs.
If Apple were to divert all Indian-made iPhones to the US market, analysts suggest it could meet around half of American demand this year. Still, India alone cannot yet replace China&rsquo;s manufacturing capacity, and Apple remains caught between two economic superpowers locked in a trade standoff.
iPhone Prices Could Skyrocket if Tariffs Persist 
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/f4ee8bf4730e8eef47dbbe17a99c4fff17a4d9a6f3f93c9ab838214b09323554" />
While Apple&rsquo;s current workaround might temporarily shield US consumers, the long-term implications remain concerning. Analysts warn that if the tariffs continue &mdash; or worse, intensify &mdash; the cost of iPhones could skyrocket.
Investment bank UBS estimates that the price of an iPhone 16 Pro Max with 256GB of storage could surge from $1,199 (~RM 5,299) to nearly $2,000 (~RM 8,840) in the US if Apple passes on the full burden of the tariff costs to consumers.
Even more extreme projections come from Wedbush Securities, which warned that manufacturing iPhones in the United States would be so costly &mdash; due to labour and operational expenses &mdash; that a domestically made iPhone could retail for as much as $3,500 (~RM 15,470) . &ldquo;If consumers want a $3,500 iPhone, we should make them in New Jersey or Texas,&rdquo; said Dan Ives, a Wedbush analyst, in a recent investor note.
Apple Not Alone in Beating the Tariff Clock
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/3af392a1a91c364b82e4fe067e71cd5e3270688c062a7485cfbae4f07633071c" />
Apple isn&rsquo;t the only company making emergency moves to beat the tariff deadlines. German automaker Porsche told analysts it had front-loaded US inventory to avoid tariff costs, a decision which may temporarily impact its quarterly results. Ferrari, meanwhile, has already announced a 10% increase in its US prices to offset new duties.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk &mdash; a vocal Trump supporter and current head of the Department of Government Efficiency &mdash; also weighed in. After taking a substantial financial hit due to the stock market&rsquo;s reaction to the tariffs, Musk reportedly urged Trump to reconsider the policy. He later called for a global move towards zero-tariff trade and took aim at Trump&rsquo;s trade adviser Peter Navarro on social media.
Global Supply Chains at a Crossroads
Apple&rsquo;s response to the trade fallout underscores the broader fragility of global supply chains in a highly politicised economic landscape. While its swift airlifts and strategic lobbying have helped soften the initial blow, the company's long-term success may hinge on how well it adapts to a world where geopolitical manoeuvres can upend logistics overnight.
With the future of the 90-day tariff pause uncertain &mdash; and China signalling it has little appetite for negotiation &mdash; Apple&rsquo;s bet on India could mark the beginning of a major manufacturing migration. For now, the company is playing a high-stakes game of global logistics chess, with billions of dollars and millions of devices in the balance.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Tech giant responds to escalating trade war between US and China. 

717c8417f974aeee02f911174bbc3bf601b7ad886bbeaa9fff784c0d0bf57c7a

Apple Races Against Time To Avoid Trump’s Tariffs By Airlifting iPhones From India

d9d56c8e5c29847e2917983575418651c94c72608ef9e914a6542c4a698d7349

Scentify

e891e864574960ae21e3a00f338f06377dd53af0baffdac1786ad4ed7dad7721

Oatside

c6e5412e94f35f5e45d8d645b31f06c7e7692356c43e40dffb5b8af1b8e8c3a9

Rohto

4a748b89ff3ed827c2f616757f44645a494284ce781ca71dce7bf93343f62cd4

Apple is facing a proposed class action lawsuit in the United States after a woman claimed she lost US$80,000 (~RM340,000) through a cryptocurrency scam app downloaded directly from the official Apple App Store.
The lawsuit was filed in California by Danyell Shin, who alleges that the app in question&mdash;Swiftcrypt&mdash;was part of a sophisticated fraud scheme commonly referred to as "pig butchering". The method involves gradually gaining a victim&rsquo;s trust before coaxing them into investing larger sums of money. Once enough funds are deposited, the perpetrators vanish&mdash;locking users out of their accounts and disappearing with the cash.
The Swiftcrypt Scam: Trust Betrayed
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/8345d3639b4aec5d8866154452c2bcf5c7358407b2fc7b23e36a41ceaaa6a454" />
Shin reportedly discovered Swiftcrypt in late 2023 or early 2024 through an online investment group. Convinced of its legitimacy&mdash;partly due to its availability on Apple&rsquo;s App Store&mdash;she downloaded the app and began investing, believing she was seeing returns. After following instructions provided within the app, she made successive deposits totalling $80,000. Then, suddenly, her access was revoked and the funds were gone.
In her lawsuit, Shin claims she reasonably relied on Apple&rsquo;s widely publicised assurances that all App Store apps undergo rigorous security screening. By hosting Swiftcrypt, she argues, Apple misled users into believing the app was trustworthy and safe to use.
Apple&rsquo;s &lsquo;Walled Garden&rsquo; Under Scrutiny
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/eb474ae66c57d2e6677a9126d8c7f16e579048cb2d1be48bf6711329c6bbfddc" />
For years, Apple has defended its exclusive App Store ecosystem as a secure and carefully curated platform. From the late Steve Jobs to current executives like Craig Federighi, the tech giant has consistently portrayed the App Store as a bulwark against cybercriminals. Apple often highlights its app review process and routinely markets the App Store as &ldquo;safe&rdquo; and &ldquo;trusted.&rdquo;
Shin&rsquo;s lawsuit challenges those claims. It accuses Apple of misrepresentation and failing in its duty to protect users by allowing a scam app to slip through its vetting process. It also points to the company&rsquo;s monopoly over app distribution on iOS devices as a contributing factor in fostering false confidence among consumers.
&ldquo;Apple has structured its ecosystem so that customers rely on Apple for the perceived safety and reliability of the App Store,&rdquo; the lawsuit argues.
Legal Claims and Broader Implications
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/53f54c80ef9f82e11c3207583554d343e13fbad6dbb2a53873e709dc589e8e86" />
The legal action seeks damages for violations of California&rsquo;s consumer protection and competition laws. It also alleges that Shin &ldquo;overpaid&rdquo; for her iPhone, under the premise that part of the phone&rsquo;s value lies in its supposedly secure App Store.
Beyond individual compensation, the suit calls for corrective advertising to clarify the real security limitations of Apple&rsquo;s platform.
The case has yet to be certified as a class action, which would require the court to determine if there are enough similarly affected individuals to proceed collectively. So far, no other victims from Shin&rsquo;s investment group have publicly joined the case.
A Pattern of Legal Firestorms
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/3040a6e38954e82fd1f55bc3cdd5b4cd22a18eadf7b25a6f33eb9397b1ce4fa7" />
This isn&rsquo;t the first time Apple&rsquo;s App Store practices have faced legal challenges. Most notably, the Epic Games v Apple case accused the company of anti-competitive behaviour by mandating the use of its own in-app purchase system, from which Apple takes a 30% commission. Apple largely emerged unscathed from that lawsuit, but it sparked widespread debate about digital marketplaces and monopolistic control.
In the UK, Apple is also facing a separate &pound;1.5 billion (approximately US$2 billion) anti-trust class action trial over similar allegations relating to its App Store policies.
Victim Blaming or Corporate Responsibility?
Some commentators have suggested that Shin shares some responsibility for her losses, noting that Swiftcrypt lacked substantial online presence or regulatory credentials. Critics argue that a basic search might have raised red flags&mdash;highlighting the barebones website and absence of legitimate reviews. Others point to the broader difficulty consumers face in distinguishing genuine apps from scams, especially within a platform marketed as safe by design.
Even so, many agree that the issue highlights the growing sophistication of fraud and the limits of current app review systems&mdash;even those managed by tech titans like Apple.
Apple Yet to Respond
As of now, Apple has not issued any formal response to the lawsuit. The Swiftcrypt app has since been removed from the App Store, and its official website has been taken down. There is no indication whether the company will attempt to settle or fight the lawsuit in court.
Meanwhile, the case underscores growing global scrutiny of major tech companies and the platforms they control. With third-party app stores now emerging in the EU under new regulations such as the Digital Markets Act (DMA), Apple&rsquo;s future grip on app distribution may weaken&mdash;but with it, possibly the consistency of app safety as well.
What are your thoughts on this? Let us know in the comments. 
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Swiftcrypt scam sparks lawsuit — is the App Store as safe as Apple claims?

77a7d90a23b32e6167d11a9a4c60444bf74ba7c7d92c76af9a5de9d81caed35b

Apple Sued Over Crypto Scam: Woman Loses $80,000 After Downloading Fraudulent App From App Store

A Malaysian company has come under intense public scrutiny after a team-building ice bath challenge left one of its female employees collapsed and unable to stand unaided. What began as a corporate wellness activity quickly turned into a viral controversy&mdash;raising questions about safety protocols, employer responsibility, and the rise of extreme self-improvement culture in the workplace.
From Motivation to Medical Emergency
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/37f623645efafc6a70c81dbd3d462c6368d0cd8d2736922d53af4bc3483b80ab" />
In a video that has since made rounds on TikTok, Instagram and Facebook, a young woman is seen participating in a team-building challenge where employees were required to remain submerged in an ice bath for a full 10 minutes. As the footage progresses, it&rsquo;s evident she is in growing physical distress&mdash;her lips turn purple, her face pales, and her body begins to tremble violently.
Despite her deteriorating condition, she pushes through while chanting motivational affirmations like:
&ldquo;I must be myself. I need to break through. I&rsquo;m not afraid of pain or hardship. I&rsquo;m not afraid to cross this road.&rdquo;
<iframe style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Freel%2F1846072592625046&amp;width=500&amp;show_text=true&amp;height=697&amp;appId" width="500" height="697" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Moments after the challenge ends, the woman appears disoriented and unable to stand. Her colleagues rush in, lifting her out of the ice-filled tub and attempting to massage her legs, which are visibly reddened from the prolonged cold exposure. She can be seen slipping into a limp state, sparking real concerns about her physical wellbeing.
Company&rsquo;s Defence: &ldquo;We&rsquo;re Not a Cult&rdquo;
The video sparked immediate online outrage, with many questioning the ethics and legality of such an exercise being carried out in a workplace setting. Critics described the act as dangerous, unnecessary, and even exploitative, with some likening it to cult-like conditioning rather than professional development.
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLC21sPP-ru/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLC21sPP-ru/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by вєℓ&iota;&eta;&part;&alpha; в&sigma;&eta;g &rho;є&iota; &fnof;є&eta;g ｜BB &amp; VV创办人 (@belindabongg)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>

<script async="" src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>

In response, the company&rsquo;s founder took to Facebook with a strongly-worded post defending the ice bath challenge and dismissing the criticism. She claimed that the event had been conducted under professional medical supervision and insisted that employees were not coerced.
&ldquo;Why do we get criticised? Is it because we&rsquo;re merely a small and medium enterprise (SME)? We&rsquo;re not a cult. We&rsquo;re just a group of women working hard for our dreams,&rdquo; she wrote.
The founder added that the challenge was inspired by similar routines performed by celebrities and influencers, including athletes and politicians, and that it was meant to build resilience, mental strength, and team spirit.
&ldquo;You can laugh at us and criticise all you want, but we will keep working hard for our dreams.&rdquo;
The Ice Bath Trend: More Than Just a Fad
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/459625245446569657581d1aeb6a1932f79e2ee5b5c9ba37de6cf09055787efb" />
The ice bath trend has surged in popularity over the last decade, bolstered initially by the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge in 2014&mdash;a viral campaign aimed at raising awareness and funds for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Since then, ice-related stunts have evolved into more extreme forms, particularly in the health and wellness space.
One of the most influential proponents is Dutch endurance athlete Wim Hof, famously known as &ldquo;The Iceman.&rdquo; Hof&rsquo;s breathing and cold therapy techniques claim to offer a range of benefits including improved immunity, reduced stress, enhanced circulation, and mental clarity.
Athletes use ice baths to aid muscle recovery, and social media has only amplified the visibility of the practice. Malaysian politician Khairy Jamaluddin has shared his own experience with cold exposure therapy. In the US, even former President Donald Trump has been photographed engaging in ice bath routines.
But what works for professional athletes or public figures under expert supervision may not be suitable for the average employee&mdash;especially in corporate settings where implied pressure and hierarchy can complicate consent.
Health Risks: What the Experts Say
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/36e740e09719142fcb4f50932d180e086cbf80cabec0b04a942fe486b9a94741" />
Medical professionals have repeatedly warned about the dangers of prolonged cold water immersion, particularly for individuals with no prior exposure or training.
Cold exposure for more than a few minutes can trigger hypothermia, fainting, or even cardiac arrest, depending on the individual&rsquo;s health, body composition, and the water temperature. Experts recommend limiting exposure to 3&ndash;5 minutes for beginners, with gradual adaptation and close monitoring by healthcare professionals.
The video raised concerns not just about the duration but also about whether informed consent was given, if participants were properly briefed, and if adequate emergency measures were in place.
Netizens React: Divided Opinions and Heated Debate
The online reaction has been mixed. While many condemned the company for prioritising spectacle over safety, others voiced support for the founder&rsquo;s defence of mental toughness. Others questioned whether employees could truly opt out of such challenges without fear of judgement or retaliation, especially in closely-knit or high-pressure work environments.
Here&rsquo;s some of the comments. Do note that some comments may not be 100% accurate due to translation:
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/cfe0223b685dbda36cec7c8b80a7586bf877da6f8b8afe2e2d8bd546ab7b9987" />
Corporate Wellness or Cult Mentality?
Team-building activities are typically designed to foster camaraderie, improve communication, and offer a break from routine. But when the line between motivation and manipulation becomes blurred, the risks&mdash;not just physical but psychological&mdash;can outweigh the intended benefits.
Experts say that corporate wellness should focus on inclusivity, emotional safety, and individual boundaries, rather than pushing employees to breaking point under the guise of empowerment.
While some employees may thrive on high-stakes challenges, for others, it may lead to trauma, burnout, or deteriorated trust in leadership.
Lessons Learned: Where Do We Draw the Line?
This controversy serves as a cautionary tale for Malaysian companies&mdash;and corporates around the world&mdash;about the need for careful planning, clear safety measures, and informed consent when introducing wellness or team-building programmes.
HR professionals and company leaders must ask themselves:
<ul>
<li>Is the activity evidence-based and safe?</li>
<li>Is it inclusive and accessible to all employees?</li>
<li>Have medical professionals been properly involved?</li>
<li>Is participation genuinely voluntary?</li>
</ul>
Without these safeguards, the pursuit of resilience and team spirit can result in very real harm&mdash;and potentially legal consequences.
The Aftermath
As of now, the company involved has not issued an apology or confirmed whether any internal review or changes to its wellness programmes are being considered. The female employee who collapsed has not spoken publicly, and her medical condition remains unclear.
The conversation around corporate wellness, employee rights, and viral trends continues online&mdash;reflecting a growing public awareness that while ambition and innovation are welcome in the workplace, employee safety must always come first.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Cold plunges can be great—but not for 10 minutes. Know your limits.

ef83410d3e0f9d7becedc185fe35367b92dc47dc74729224b4fccaf3d1945823

Masterclass Or Misstep? Malaysian SME Slammed After Ice Bath Team-Building Ends In Collapse

In a harrowing case that has sent shockwaves across Malaysia, a former MasterChef Malaysia finalist and her ex-husband have each been sentenced to 34 years in prison for the torture and murder of their 28-year-old Indonesian domestic helper. The case, heard at the Kota Kinabalu High Court, exposed disturbing details of prolonged abuse suffered by the victim, whose death came amid the isolation of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Victim Abused in Silence
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/3f31cf9970a7079d26072ba558dff17b6853a36b29c20a054cbad048f4f15992" />
The court found that Etiqah Siti Noorashikeen Mohd Sulong, 37, and her former spouse, Mohammad Ambree Yunos, 44, were jointly responsible for the death of Nur Afiyah Daeng Damin. The crime took place over several days between 8 and 11 December 2021 at their shared residence in Amber Tower, Lido Avenue Condominium, located in Penampang, Sabah.
The prosecution revealed that Nur Afiyah, who had migrated from Indonesia to work as a maid, was subjected to persistent mistreatment and inhumane working conditions. She was not only deprived of wages and basic rights, but also physically tortured over an extended period. Photos and videos presented in court&mdash;recovered from the couple&rsquo;s own mobile phones&mdash;graphically captured the abuse she endured in the days leading up to her death.
Brutality Captured on Camera
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/1bbebfcc1e19e7e0d6a9c2cb8ae7a54ca36309eed41dad0f2d1278eb086088d0" />
According to Deputy Public Prosecutor Dacia Jane Romanus, the abuse was systematic and deliberate. &ldquo;This was not a killing born out of rage or a single moment of violence,&rdquo; she said. &ldquo;It was prolonged, premeditated torture, with no regard for the victim&rsquo;s humanity.&rdquo;
The videos and images showed visible signs of physical injury, with the court hearing that the couple had even documented the abuse themselves, seemingly without remorse. The disturbing nature of the footage strengthened the prosecution&rsquo;s argument that the pair had every intention of inflicting harm and had acted with a shared purpose.
&ldquo;This was a young woman who left her home to earn a living honestly in the midst of a global pandemic,&rdquo; Dacia told the court. &ldquo;She died not in an accident, not in an act of sudden violence, but as a result of sustained, systematic cruelty at the hands of those who were supposed to protect and shelter her.&rdquo;
Court Delivers Verdict and Sentencing
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/62338b84cb95fbcacdaf61013f99d5c70b34ee9c5858cb20e4105167e2ec178a" />
Presiding over the trial, High Court Judge Datuk Dr Lim Hock Leng ruled that the evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt that both Etiqah and Ambree acted with common intention to murder Nur Afiyah. Their failure to provide medical care, food, and fair treatment, paired with overwhelming evidence of injury and abuse, led to their conviction.
The two were charged under Section 302 of the Penal Code, read together with Section 34, which pertains to murder committed by more than one person. This section allows for the death penalty, or imprisonment for not less than 30 years and up to 40 years, as well as not fewer than 12 strokes of the cane for those not sentenced to death.
While the Attorney-General&rsquo;s Chambers initially pushed for the mandatory death sentence, Judge Lim instead imposed 34 years of imprisonment for both individuals, citing the severity of the crime and the strength of the evidence. Ambree was also ordered to receive 12 strokes of the rotan, while Etiqah was exempted from caning due to her gender, in line with Section 289 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Both convicts, who had previously been out on bail, were ordered to begin serving their sentences immediately from the date of conviction.
Defence Fails to Raise Doubt
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/a945c0ac924bed3d43fb0204cfc0e75249bba387f387408552ceb9452d1373d1" /> Etiqah Siti Noorashikeen Mohd Sulang with lawyer Rakhbir Singh at the Court of Appeal in Kota Kinabalu, three years ago. 
In his judgement, Judge Lim noted that the defence had failed to raise any reasonable doubt in the face of overwhelming forensic and photographic evidence. The nature, location, and duration of the victim&rsquo;s injuries were consistent with repeated and intentional infliction of harm, and not an accident or isolated incident.
The court also noted the emotional and psychological torment suffered by the victim, who had been isolated from any form of external support or protection. The judge highlighted how this case reflects not just individual criminality, but also broader systemic vulnerabilities faced by domestic workers&mdash;particularly foreign nationals&mdash;living in private homes in Malaysia.
Prosecution: &ldquo;A Case That Shook the Nation&rdquo;
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/369ba04fa7610d270b306b518eb5d8ea9badaa54457bac23792959f8af3e19f6" />
Calling the crime one of the most distressing cases of recent years, DPP Dacia Jane Romanus urged the court to consider the broader impact on society. &ldquo;The brutality of this case has not only appalled Sabah, but the entire country. It speaks to a failure in how we treat those who come into our homes to serve and support us.&rdquo;
She added that Nur Afiyah was not only denied wages and freedom of movement but was also robbed of dignity and life. &ldquo;She was never allowed to return home. Her body did, but her hopes, her sacrifices, were extinguished behind closed doors,&rdquo; she said.
Public Backlash and Broader Concerns
The case has reignited public outrage over the treatment of domestic workers in Malaysia, particularly those from Indonesia, the Philippines, and Cambodia. NGOs and human rights groups have long campaigned for better safeguards and routine checks, as many workers operate without contracts, proper wages, or protection from abuse.
The fact that Etiqah had once gained public recognition as a finalist in MasterChef Malaysia 2012 made the case all the more shocking, with many questioning how someone in the public eye could inflict such cruelty behind closed doors.
Justice Served&mdash;But Questions Remain
With the sentence now handed down, many hope the conviction marks a turning point in how the legal system handles cases of domestic worker abuse. However, activists caution that without consistent enforcement and policy reforms, many other cases may remain hidden.
Meanwhile, the victim's family in Indonesia is left grappling with a painful loss. No amount of sentencing, they say, can replace the daughter who left to provide for her family and returned in a coffin.
This case stands as a chilling reminder: justice, when delayed or denied, often comes too late for the vulnerable. For Nur Afiyah, the courtroom brought justice after death. For others still living under oppression, it may be the only hope.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

While Etiqah was exempted from the rotan due to her gender, her ex-husband Ambree was ordered to receive 12 strokes of the cane.

ab913615cee49d2d8512a9f2d0146eb430beb6469209b488b57f97f85918f6f8

MasterChef Malaysia Finalist And Ex-Husband Jailed 34 Years For Maid's Murder

Former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has once again escaped conviction in one of his many legal battles, after the High Court granted him a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) over RM27 million allegedly misappropriated from SRC International. However, the 70-year-old remains behind bars, serving a six-year sentence for a separate SRC-related conviction involving RM42 million.
SRC International: The RM27 Million DNAA Explained
<iframe style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fnajibrazak%2Fposts%2Fpfbid02TiwoRcLMXtckDyrxkJkEpe5Ew9JEmp3sbjNWUzdvx6BnB5bZtxnEdrQanRbX9pbFl&amp;show_text=true&amp;width=500" width="500" height="624" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>&nbsp;
On 20 June 2025, High Court Judge K Muniandy delivered the long-awaited decision on Najib's final SRC-related criminal case, which had stalled since charges were first brought in February 2019. The former premier had been accused of receiving RM27 million in illegal proceeds through his AmPrivate Banking accounts on 8 July 2014.
The judge ruled in favour of a DNAA, agreeing with the defence that it would be unjust for Najib to continue facing charges indefinitely without trial. Noting the prosecution&rsquo;s repeated delays and inability to proceed&mdash;despite six years having passed&mdash;Justice Muniandy said there was no sign the case could move forward within a reasonable time frame.
&ldquo;The prolonged wait has become a long haul for the accused, denying him timely resolution,&rdquo; the judge said. He emphasised that criminal charges should not hang over an accused like &ldquo;the sword of Damocles.&rdquo;
A DNAA means Najib is released from the charges, but not acquitted&mdash;should fresh evidence emerge, the prosecution may reopen the case.
Prosecution&rsquo;s Delays and Missing Documents
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/7ab937d699a838aeb527ed37289ca16e8dde99b05c558748df9bbacbb8648a4e" />
Najib&rsquo;s lead counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, revealed the prosecution had failed to compile over 500 essential documents needed to move forward with trial. When queried by the court in May, the deputy public prosecutor admitted they could not commit to a timeline, leading to further uncertainty.
The judge also noted that no witnesses had been called in the six years since the case was filed, with only repeated postponements. Even the prosecution conceded it would not be prejudiced by a DNAA, highlighting the case&rsquo;s deadlocked state.
Shafee later told reporters that Najib was &ldquo;very happy&rdquo; with the outcome, adding that the number of cases hanging over his client was now diminishing, allowing the former premier to focus solely on the high-profile 1MDB trial.
Najib&rsquo;s Ongoing Legal Woes
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/5379d4145a2d71b8d6443e17be09a74b78ccb33b3adf88755fcad48df6780080" />
While the RM27 million SRC case is now on pause, Najib is far from a free man.
He remains imprisoned in Kajang Prison after being convicted in 2020 for seven charges involving RM42 million from SRC International, including criminal breach of trust, abuse of power, and money laundering. The conviction was upheld by the Court of Appeal in 2021 and the Federal Court in 2022. Initially sentenced to 12 years in prison and fined RM210 million, Najib&rsquo;s sentence was halved in 2024 following a partial royal pardon.
The 1MDB-linked case that landed him in prison was the first to result in an actual conviction&mdash;but it is far from his only legal entanglement.
The Larger 1MDB Scandal and Other DNAA Cases
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/aa4c0c5afbd5c019f4dff8129179d387be9f2f3cda1e4a3522dec3a63c218fd7" />
Najib is currently fighting a separate, more complex case: the 1MDB-Tanore trial. He faces four charges of abuse of power and 21 charges of money laundering involving RM2.27 billion in 1MDB funds. That trial, which began more than seven years ago, is finally nearing its end. Written submissions are due by 30 September 2025, with oral arguments scheduled for October.
He has previously been granted DNAA status in other high-profile cases:
<ul>
<li>RM6.6 Billion IPIC Case: In 2018, Najib and former Treasury secretary-general Tan Sri Irwan Serigar were charged with criminal breach of trust over RM6.6 billion related to a settlement between 1MDB and Abu Dhabi&rsquo;s International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC). The case stalled due to missing documents and was DNAA&rsquo;d in 2023.</li>
<li>1MDB Audit Report Tampering: Najib and former 1MDB CEO Arul Kanda were acquitted in 2023 of tampering with the 1MDB final audit report after the court found insufficient evidence.</li>
</ul>
House Arrest Bid and Ongoing Controversies
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/99644eb54db6f13278d94eb00d0a370e80ca96ab018fac57d884460d06c75c0a" />
Najib is also pursuing a civil application seeking to serve the remainder of his prison term under house arrest, based on an alleged &ldquo;royal addendum&rdquo; issued in January 2024 by former King Al-Sultan Abdullah. His legal team claims this royal order was overlooked by authorities.
His lawyer Shafee recently lodged a police report against former Attorney General Ahmad Terrirudin Salleh, accusing him of misleading the courts by claiming that the addendum did not exist. Shafee maintains that the former AG had full knowledge of the document, which allegedly permits Najib to complete his sentence under house arrest.
However, access to confirm the existence of the royal decree has reportedly been stalled by the Ministry of Home Affairs. Shafee said the Prisons Department had no objection to Najib lodging a police report himself, but Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail had not granted permission despite multiple written requests.
What Happens Next?
For now, Najib&rsquo;s legal focus shifts solely to the 1MDB-Tanore case. If he is found guilty, it could add more jail time on top of his current sentence&mdash;even with the reduced term from the royal pardon.
The DNAA granted in the RM27 million SRC case spares Najib from immediate further prosecution, but it remains a temporary reprieve. The prosecution is free to reinstate the charges when ready, and the shadow of his extensive legal history still looms large over the former prime minister.
With mounting controversies and his legacy deeply entwined with one of the world's most infamous financial scandals, Najib Razak&rsquo;s courtroom saga is far from over.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

One case dropped. But the legal battles are far from over.

7c514ff574ab19e688311eab2750c5d22f9efe9b65b62ac02d3ac8f6f2f50b53

Najib Razak Walks Free From RM27 Million SRC Charges – But Remains A Jailed Man

Penang&rsquo;s long-anticipated Light Rail Transit (LRT) project is finally set to break ground, with physical construction works expected to begin as early as August 2025. Transport Minister Anthony Loke recently confirmed the update, noting that preparatory works, including piling, will commence within the next month or two.
Malaysia&rsquo;s First LRT Outside Klang Valley
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/f4ac82b11784c1f6a1ad20b3a5cb4aef54b651ba87f886d088a4286722085e5d" />
The Mutiara Line marks a significant milestone for Penang and for Malaysia&rsquo;s public transport development. It will be the country&rsquo;s first LRT system located outside the Klang Valley and aims to transform mobility across the northern state. The project was originally proposed in 2015 under the Penang Transport Master Plan (PTMP), with the goal of easing traffic congestion and offering a more efficient alternative to road travel.
Initially led by the state government, the project was taken over by the federal government in early 2024. MRT Corporation has since been appointed as the official developer and asset owner, bringing with it the experience and infrastructure expertise from the Klang Valley MRT lines.
A 29.5km Line Connecting Key Districts
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/fa35de7e4e5e3b23856ca239ec976043d0f81350ee9b7e57b53ddb05b91f2194" />
The Mutiara Line will span 29.5km and include 21 stations. It will link George Town&rsquo;s city centre with Jelutong, Gelugor, and Bayan Lepas on Penang Island, before extending across the channel to Seberang Perai on the mainland. A full end-to-end trip is expected to take approximately 49 minutes.
Transport authorities estimate that the line will serve around 45,600 passengers per day during its first year of operation. It is also expected to play a key role in reducing the state&rsquo;s vehicle dependency, especially among daily commuters.
All Approvals Settled, Work Packages Awarded
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/0bafa55ac7772a9e1bdd2c147248b0cddc54331fc01cbfea998a6c6a4ed3190b" />
Transport Minister Loke confirmed that all administrative issues between the federal and state governments have now been resolved. &ldquo;Penang doesn&rsquo;t need to wait anymore. Everything is done,&rdquo; he said, adding that the Notice to Proceed has been issued and all relevant documents, including letters of release, are in place.
He also mentioned that major work packages have already been awarded to subcontractors by the main contractor. Among them is Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd, which recently secured a RM42.82 million contract for bored piling and related groundwork from Irama Duta Sdn Bhd.
Acknowledging Penang&rsquo;s existing traffic challenges, Loke assured that proper traffic management plans will be implemented to minimise disruptions during construction. &ldquo;We&rsquo;ve requested that, once piling and construction begin, there must be a proper traffic diversion plan in place,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;As with any construction project, there will be some impact, but our aim is to keep it manageable.&rdquo;
Residents can expect regular updates and engagement efforts from local authorities and MRT Corp as works progress, especially in high-traffic areas near George Town and Bayan Lepas.
Target Completion by 2030
The full completion of the Mutiara Line is slated for 2030. While this may seem a long wait, transport experts note that the complexity of urban rail infrastructure &mdash; particularly in heritage-rich and densely built-up areas like George Town &mdash; requires careful planning and phased execution.
The government has not ruled out the possibility of certain segments becoming operational ahead of full completion if conditions allow.
A New Era for Penang&rsquo;s Urban Mobility
Once operational, the LRT will not only ease traffic congestion but also offer a more sustainable, reliable alternative to private vehicle usage. It is expected to spur economic activity along the corridor, increase property values near stations, and create job opportunities throughout its construction and operation phases.
For Penang, the Mutiara Line represents more than just a transport upgrade &mdash; it&rsquo;s a vision for a more connected, accessible, and modern future.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Here’s hoping Penang’s new train system will finally ease traffic congestion across the island.

aa4a3917c798363693f1e062da3f7cede73676cbcf6cea4e7aef7ab57b2cf842

Penang’s First-Ever LRT: Mutiara Line Construction To Begin By August 2025

Gamers in Malaysia have reason to celebrate &ndash; the Nintendo Switch 2 is officially launching on 3 July 2025, with pre-orders already open through major retailers. This comes just days after Nintendo Southeast Asia made the announcement via its official Facebook page and updated the Malaysian website with full product listings.
As excitement builds, early adopters may want to act quickly &ndash; especially with stocks for certain models already dwindling. But while the upgraded hybrid console brings new features and highly anticipated titles, its premium pricing is already raising eyebrows &ndash; especially when compared to rivals like the PlayStation 5.
Launch Date, Models &amp; Availability
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/c31b0847161eb6ff37d189f4dd2cb976a6066703c415339a82844965c79eaf71" />
Nintendo has confirmed two models for the Malaysian market:
<ul>
<li>Nintendo Switch 2 Standalone Set &ndash; RM2,488</li>
<li>Nintendo Switch 2 Mario Kart World Bundle &ndash; RM2,688</li>
</ul>
Both options come with a one-year official Malaysian warranty, managed by Convergent Distribution, Nintendo&rsquo;s official distributor in Malaysia. The Mario Kart World bundle includes the full game in physical card format, not a download code.
Launch units will be available in stores nationwide starting 3 July, with pre-orders currently live on platforms like Shopee and Lazada via the Nintendo Official Store Malaysia.
Shipping &amp; Pre-Order Demand
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/81ae45aa537c161a877d90d06be3114fa1287796f415fa1ca79ffc187b8a3760" />
Despite the 3 July launch date, shipping timelines on e-commerce platforms indicate that delivery may occur later than expected. Shopee estimates delivery between 20 July to 7 August, while Lazada lists guaranteed arrival between 23 to 25 July.
Demand has already skewed heavily toward the Mario Kart World bundle, with stock levels for the standalone version running low, according to a quick check of Shopee listings.
&nbsp;
Where to Buy
Nintendo&rsquo;s official distributor has released a comprehensive list of authorised retailers. Some of the most popular outlets include:
<ul>
<li>Asashi Technology (Wangsa Walk, Melawati Mall)</li>
<li>Best Denki (1 Utama, KLCC, MyTown, IOI City Mall)</li>
<li>Thunder Match (TMT) (Mid Valley, Pavilion Bukit Jalil, Sunway Pyramid)</li>
<li>Harvey Norman, Fotocharlie, Popular Bookstore, ToyPanic, [i] Store, and many more across Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak.</li>
</ul>
Many of these stores have started taking pre-orders both in-person and online.
Confirmed Launch Titles &amp; Pricing
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/2d7dafaa2e34c872d70b457532104c2ae38790bc600adcae823ae9b8028c846a" />
Gamers can look forward to a robust launch lineup, with several exclusive and reworked titles available from day one:
<ul>
<li>Mario Kart World &ndash; RM398</li>
<li>Tamagotchi Plaza (Switch 2 Edition) &ndash; RM230</li>
<li>The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom (Switch 2 Edition) &ndash; RM298</li>
<li>The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild (Switch 2 Edition) &ndash; RM265</li>
<li>Bravely Default: Flying Fairy HD Remaster &ndash; RM165</li>
</ul>
These games are being offered in physical form with Malaysian-certified cartridges, eliminating the need for lengthy downloads.
Accessories and Add-ons
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/a5d0df9150e2b1c59017238a29bd706cbaf04c28463e75e8b7f2cbd445115afb" />
A wide range of first-party accessories will also be available for purchase on launch day. Prices are as follows:
<ul>
<li>Nintendo Switch 2 Pro Controller &ndash; RM388</li>
<li>Joy-Con 2 (Left &amp; Right) &ndash; RM498</li>
<li>Single Joy-Con 2 (Left or Right) &ndash; RM258</li>
<li>Joy-Con Charging Grip &ndash; RM183</li>
<li>Joy-Con Wheel (Set of 2) &ndash; RM108</li>
<li>AC Adapter &ndash; RM168</li>
<li>Carrying Case + Screen Protector &ndash; RM128</li>
<li>Nintendo Switch Camera &ndash; RM258</li>
<li>SanDisk microSD Express 256GB &ndash; RM298</li>
</ul>
Only the Pro Controller, Joy-Con 2, and Switch Camera are confirmed to carry a one-year official warranty. The status of warranty coverage for other accessories remains unclear.
Why It&rsquo;s More Expensive Than You Think
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/d951fa1f7b8bd79ab61f11c9f684e0e64a418c079617020c63724ea48abb3446" />
While the excitement surrounding the Switch 2 is understandable, some gamers may hesitate when comparing its pricing to other consoles in the market.
At RM2,488, the base Switch 2 costs more than the PS5 Slim Digital Edition, currently priced at RM2,069. Even the PS5 Slim Disc Edition, with enhanced graphics and a Blu-ray drive, is just RM2,499 &ndash; a mere RM11 more than Nintendo&rsquo;s new console.
In essence, for roughly the same price (or even less), consumers can opt for a PlayStation 5, a more powerful console in terms of hardware performance, with a larger third-party game library, native 4K gaming support, and access to high-end exclusives like Spider-Man 2, Final Fantasy XVI, and God of War: Ragnar&ouml;k.
While the Nintendo Switch 2 offers unique portability and family-friendly titles, its premium price and mid-range specs might give serious gamers pause &mdash; especially those seeking maximum performance per ringgit.
Final Thoughts
The Nintendo Switch 2 marks an exciting chapter for Nintendo fans in Malaysia, offering a long-overdue upgrade and strong launch support. Its hybrid nature, exclusive titles, and family-friendly experience continue to set it apart in a competitive gaming landscape.
However, prospective buyers will need to weigh the value proposition carefully. With the PS5 available at a lower price, the Switch 2&rsquo;s success may ultimately hinge on Nintendo&rsquo;s unique software ecosystem and the appeal of its innovative gameplay format &mdash; not necessarily its technical prowess.
Whether you&rsquo;re in it for Zelda, Mario Kart, or the portable experience, one thing is certain: gaming in Malaysia just got a lot more interesting &mdash; and expensive.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Cheaper to get a PS5 — is the Switch 2 still worth the hype?

Apple Races Against Time To Avoid Trump’s Tariffs By Airlifting iPhones From India

Tech giant responds to escalating trade war between US and China.

Latest News

Apple Sued Over Crypto Scam: Woman Loses $80,000 After Downloading Fraudulent App From App Store

Masterclass Or Misstep? Malaysian SME Slammed After Ice Bath Team-Building Ends In Collapse

MasterChef Malaysia Finalist And Ex-Husband Jailed 34 Years For Maid's Murder

Najib Razak Walks Free From RM27 Million SRC Charges – But Remains A Jailed Man

Penang’s First-Ever LRT: Mutiara Line Construction To Begin By August 2025

Related Articles

Masterclass Or Misstep? Malaysian SME Slammed After Ice Bath Team-Building Ends In Collapse

MasterChef Malaysia Finalist And Ex-Husband Jailed 34 Years For Maid's Murder

Najib Razak Walks Free From RM27 Million SRC Charges – But Remains A Jailed Man

Penang’s First-Ever LRT: Mutiara Line Construction To Begin By August 2025

Nintendo Switch 2 Set to Launch in Malaysia on 3 July 2025; Priced From RM2,488

Related Articles

Masterclass Or Misstep? Malaysian SME Slammed After Ice Bath Team-Building Ends In Collapse

MasterChef Malaysia Finalist And Ex-Husband Jailed 34 Years For Maid's Murder

Najib Razak Walks Free From RM27 Million SRC Charges – But Remains A Jailed Man

Penang’s First-Ever LRT: Mutiara Line Construction To Begin By August 2025

Nintendo Switch 2 Set to Launch in Malaysia on 3 July 2025; Priced From RM2,488